William Jansen vs Hiroki Sakagawa Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
W. Jansen vs H. Sakagawa

William Jansen
GBR
l
l
l
w
w
w
w
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
20
Age
24
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Hiroki Sakagawa
JPN
w
w
l
l
w
l
w
l
w
w
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
20
Age
24
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Jansen 1 - 0 Sakagawa
They have played 2 sets in total, with William Jansen winning 2 and Hiroki Sakagawa winning 0. The last match between William Jansen and Hiroki Sakagawa was at the M25 Columbus, 14-11-2024, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with William Jansen getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jansen | 1 |
| Sakagawa | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M25 Columbus(11-14-24)
William Jansen
7
6
Hiroki Sakagawa
6
2
W. Jansen vs H. Sakagawa H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 54.05% (40-34) | Career Total W/L | 52.27% (23-21) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
W. Jansen vs H. Sakagawa Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), William Jansen has won 46.93% of points on their second serve, while Hiroki Sakagawa has won 53.23%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show William Jansen, in recent form, has won 41.99% of their opponent's second serve points, while Hiroki Sakagawa has won 51.95%. The same stats for first serve returns are 23.17% and 34.74% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: William Jansen has saved 58.33% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hiroki Sakagawa has saved 62.50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year William Jansen has won 52.94% of matches played (W/L 9/8), with Hiroki Sakagawa winning 60.00% (W/L 6/4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: William Jansen has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 28/21), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 27% (W/L 3/8). Hiroki Sakagawa has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 3/2), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 5/5).
- Player level: In the last year, William Jansen has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56.25% of matches (W/L 9/7), where as Hiroki Sakagawa has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60.00% of matches (W/L 6/4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with William Jansen winning 1 times and Hiroki Sakagawa being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with William Jansen winning 2 and Hiroki Sakagawa winning 0.
- The last match between William Jansen and Hiroki Sakagawa was at the M25 Columbus, 14-11-2024, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with William Jansen getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, William Jansen has played against opponents with an average rank of 388.53 while Hiroki Sakagawa has played against players with an average rank of 228.7.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, William Jansen has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hiroki Sakagawa has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, William Jansen has converted 22.22% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hiroki Sakagawa has converted 43.75% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
William Jansen vs Hiroki Sakagawa Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
W. Jansen vs H. Sakagawa H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 11 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:0:0 | Average Match Time | 2:0:0 |
| 63% (38/60) | 1st Serve % | 65% (44/68) |
| 82% (31/38) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (27/44) |
| 50% (11/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (13/24) |
| 33% (3/9) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (1/2) |
| 41% (28/68) | Return Points Win % | 30% (18/60) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Jansen 50%, Sakagawa 46%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Jansen 46%, Sakagawa 46%.
Break Points Saved %: Jansen 70%, Sakagawa 60%.
W. Jansen Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||
QF | L | 7-6(6) 6-3 | ||
R2 | W | 6-1 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-4 | ||
H. Sakagawa Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | W | 3-6 7-6(5) 11-9 | ||
Q1 | W | 7-6(6) 6-0 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-7(6) 6-4 10-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-1 6-0 | ||
Q3 | L | 2-6 6-0 10-6 | ||

W. Jansen vs H. Sakagawa Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.05% (40/34) | YTD Win/Loss | 53.49% (23/20) |
| 54.17% (91/77) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.00% (52/48) |
| 53.94% (856/731) | Games Win/Loss | 52.25% (510/466) |
| 57.14% (28/21) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.57% (15/13) |
| 0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.00% (3/2) |
| 64.29% (9/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (5/5) |
| 27.27% (3/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.4 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 312 | Aces Total | 12 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.06 |
| 121 | Total Double Faults | 28 |
| 1:31:2 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 376.65 | Average Opponent Rank | 293.3 |
| 66% (2853/4324) | 1st Serve % | 67% (793/1176) |
| 68% (1948/2853) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (461/793) |
| 52% (758/1471) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (187/383) |
| 45% (177/395) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (58/115) |
| 39% (1650/4258) | Return Points Win % | 43% (487/1143) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/5) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 58.82% (40/28) | Futures W/L | 53.49% (23/20) |
| 55% (40/73) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (23/43) |
| 45% (9/20) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (4/8) |
| 48% (10/21) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (8/14) |
| 85% (40/34) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 73% (22/16) |
| 13% (40/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 27% (22/6) |
| 18% (34/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 33% (21/7) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
01:00 PM 20/11/25
Prediction04:00 AM 21/11/25
Prediction07:05 PM 19/11/25
Prediction07:20 PM 19/11/25
Prediction12:30 PM 20/11/25
Prediction05:00 AM 20/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

19 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Flavio Cobolli vs Filip Misolic Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, QF, ITA – 19th November 2025 Best Bets

19 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Matteo Berrettini vs Jurij Rodionov Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, QF, ITA – 19th November 2025 Best Bets

19 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kathinka Von Deichmann vs Elena Gabriela Ruse Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 19th November 2025 Best Bets

18 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Eva Vedder vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 19th November 2025 Best Bets

18 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Shintaro Mochizuki vs Federico Arnaboldi Prediction – ATP Bergamo Challenger – 18th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
20:15
H2H 1-0
20:05
H2H 1-0
19:20
H2H 0-0
21:00
H2H 0-0
21:05
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Davis Cup, World Group, QF, ITA-AUT
Italy
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Santiago
Chile
M15 Tallahassee
United States
M25 Austin
United States
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia